Halo Flood: 1-hit vs 2-hits

どちらの方が好きですか?


  • Total voters
    9

ShockBolt21

Master
Feb 1, 2013
1,097
346
166
USA- Eastern Time Zone
When creating flood maps and game types, forgers have two options when it comes to flood damage settings. They can allow humans to be killed by one flood slash ('1-hit flood' game types), or they can boost humans' health so that it takes two hits to kill them ('2-hit flood' game types). Game types also exist that allow humans to survive two hits and die only after three or more, though these are less common. Although default flood settings and the original flood game type use 1-hit settings, the general preference of the custom gaming community seems to lean towards 2-hit flood.

In my opinion, giving the humans the second life ruins the game, and there are a few reasons for this.

Why 1-Hit Flood?

In order to balance the extra life, forgers usually need to increase flood health as well. It is extremely annoying as a human to have to shoot at the flood for such a long time before they finally drop. Combined with the increased speed and maneuverability the flood naturally have (for example, in the hivemind game type), this makes them quite difficult to kill. As a human, while it is nice to have the second life, the only reason you actually need it is because you can't kill the flood in time because their health is too damn high, and they land a hit on you before you kill it.

Another issue is that the extra chance does not always work. What will often happen is that flood will lunge at a human with full health and hit him once, then immediately hit him again before the human can eliminate the flood or otherwise get himself back to a safe position. this happens to me frequently, as I play with a low sensitivity (for increased accuracy), and I can not always turn fast enough to keep up with the flood when it is right on top of me.

So, the extra life is not useful for when the flood attack you from behind, as they will hit you twice before you can react. It also isn't really useful for when you see them first, as their increased health will give them plenty of time to sponge up your damage and land a hit on you before they actually get you (with regular damage settings, you could have dropped him before he got close). It is really only useful for when you're moving forward and you run into a flood, or one pops out in front of you, as you can take him down with a melee attack even if he gets you first- however, this brings me to my third point.

The third issue I have is that it is terribly annoying as flood to have to hit the human twice to kill them. It's terrible when a flood finally manages to get close enough to a human to hit him, only to take a rifle butt or a shotgun blast to the face from that person, who you did not actually manage to kill. And of course, there's a good chance that he will heal up not too much later, so your efforts will have been all for nothing.

2-hit flood settings also force the humans to group up and fight in clusters, as the only way they can take out the flood before they come close is to combine their firepower. Some players may like this, as it encourages teamwork. However, I like to hold out from an isolated vantage point, away from the heart of the action. However, this is difficult in two-hit game types, because even if I see the flood and start shooting at it long before it is actually close, it's hard to do enough damage to kill it before it reaches and strikes me at least once, seeing as they have higher health. Although I dislike having to bunch up and rely on the other humans to determine where I have to stand, it's the only way to succeed in a 2-hit game type.

So it's for these reasons that I prefer 1-hit variants to 2-hit, and why I often find myself voting for standard Flood rather than Hivemind or Last Stand when playing in Matchmaking. Let me know which you guys prefer by answering the poll, and feel free to discuss your opinions.
 
Last edited:

S0UL FLAME

Proficient
Apr 17, 2014
65
43
33
30
It's very easy to balance Flood and Spartan health; the problem lies within the maps played. Strong weapons like Shotguns and SAWs should be far and few between. Accurate weapons like Magnums and Carbines shouldn't take any more than a third of the magazine to kill a Flood if they're all headshots. I say 2-hit is more equal to both parties.
 

Skyward Shoe

Platinum in Destiny
Dec 24, 2012
864
988
211
Redmond, Washington
I made an infection map designed for 3-hit humans. :cool:

I feel like 1 vs 2 hit depends on the type of flood. For linear maps having a human die right of the bat massively changes how the game may play out, whereas on more holdout based maps 1 hit can work just fine. Sometimes you are trying to promote human teamwork, sometimes it's more about trying to run and hide and get the most kills before everyone inevitably dies. I tend to prefer the multi-hit because I prefer human teamwork and I also prefer to be a flood with more health, but to each their own.

My biggest question is this however: Why is the poll question written in Chinese/ Japanese?
 

ShockBolt21

Master
Feb 1, 2013
1,097
346
166
USA- Eastern Time Zone
I feel like 1 vs 2 hit depends on the type of flood...
Well said. I agree that 2-hit works just fine for linear game types, as humans do tend to cluster up more, and the flood often have the advantage of being able to drop from above or pop out from corners while the humans wait to progress.

My biggest question is this however: Why is the poll question written in Chinese/ Japanese?
Only cause I felt like it, and because I just recently learned that grammar style in class. It merely says 'which do you prefer'- I figured that by reading the answers, you wouldn't need to see the question to understand the poll. It is Japanese, by the way.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Skyward Shoe